![]() ![]() With either REPLACE() or TRANSLATE(), if the string is NULL, the value returned.TRANSLATE() only works on SQL Server 2017.REPLACE() and TRANSLATE() are both string functions and substitute characters.Replace the REPLACE() function? The answer is kind of, but not entirely. To answer the question from the beginning, can TRANSLATE() Since TRANSLATE() didn't exist before SQL ServerĢ017, you can't use it if you're on an older version. Trying to clean up a list of characters and need to nest multiple REPLACE() functions Replacing the word "Home" with "Office." However, if you're If you want to replace a string with another, stick with REPLACE(), for example, Unless your column doesn't allow NULLs, they are always The second and third arguments are a list of characters, list being the keyword.Īs mentioned previously, remember to create a remediation plan if you have a What does the basic syntax of TRANSLATE() look like? One crucial point is that However,Īfter seeing an example, the confusion cleared up. I assumed it had something to do with language translation. When first looking at TRANSLATE(), I had no idea you could swap it for REPLACE()īased on the name. Set of characters specified in the third argument. TRANSLATE() as a function that returns the string provided as a first argumentĪfter some characters specified in the second argument are translated into a destination Level is at 140 or higher to take advantage of it. ![]() You must ensure your database compatibility Use TRANSLATE() in Oracle long before then. Of doing this to remove the clutter? That's where our next function comes This pattern reminds me of a nested CASE expression. However, I'll admit it does make your T-SQL hard to read the deeper I've likely used up to 8 or 10 REPLACE() functions when the situation calledįor it. In the example above, there is absolutely nothing wrong with nesting REPLACE().
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |